Privately operated educational resource. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

About

Our editorial standards

Our guides are built on official government sources, written in plain language, dated, and updated when rules change. Drafts may be prepared with AI assistance, then checked by our editors against the official sources they cite. Advertisers have no say over what we publish.

Female scientist in a white lab coat working at a laptop in a laboratory

Who we write for

We write for people trying to understand U.S. immigration: workers, students, families, investors, employers and anyone helping them. Our aim is accurate, practical general information. We do not write legal advice for individual cases, and we say so when a question really needs an attorney.

Woman typing on a laptop at a table by a window with a cup of coffee

Sourcing

We rank sources in this order:

  1. Primary official sources: agency websites and policy manuals (for example uscis.gov, travel.state.gov, dol.gov, cbp.gov and justice.gov/eoir), official forms and instructions, the Federal Register, the Code of Federal Regulations, statutes on congress.gov and court records.
  2. Reputable secondary sources: university international offices, bar associations, established legal publishers and law firm alerts. We use these to find and understand primary sources, not as a substitute for them.

We do not rely on forums, social media posts or unattributed claims for facts. Every guide lists the official sources it depends on, and we link to them so you can check them yourself.

When we cannot confirm a figure, date or rule from an official source, we leave it out rather than guess. We do not invent statistics, quotes, case names or fees.

How we write

  • Answer first. The opening paragraph answers the page's main question directly.
  • Plain language. We define legal terms and use the official names of forms and programs so you can find them on government sites.
  • No guarantees. Eligibility depends on facts we cannot see. We use words like "may," "generally" and "often," and we never tell readers they qualify or will be approved.
  • Calm and fair. We avoid hype, fear and political commentary. When a rule is contested in court, we describe what is in effect and what is pending, with dates.
  • Original writing. We write in our own words and credit the sources we use.

Review process

  1. Research. We gather the official sources for the topic and note the date each was checked.
  2. Drafting. A draft is written, sometimes with AI assistance (see below).
  3. Fact-check. An editor checks every fee, date, form number, deadline and legal requirement against the cited official source. Anything that cannot be confirmed is removed.
  4. Edit. The editor reviews clarity, tone and balance, and checks that the guide does not promise outcomes or give individual legal advice.
  5. Legal review. We are building a panel of immigration attorneys to review our legal guides. A guide shows the reviewer's name once it has been reviewed. If no reviewer is shown, the guide has not yet had attorney review.
  6. Publication. The guide goes live with its "updated" date and source list.

Updating and dating

Immigration rules change through new regulations, agency announcements, court decisions and monthly bulletins. We handle that in three ways:

  • Visible dates. Each page shows when it was last updated. Figures that change, such as fees and processing times, are stated "as of" a specific month and year.
  • Change monitoring. We follow official announcements and the Federal Register and update affected guides. Significant changes are summarized on our policy tracker.
  • Scheduled review. We revisit guides periodically even when nothing obvious has changed, because small details drift.

We change the "updated" date only when we have actually reviewed or changed the content, not to make a page look fresh.

Use of AI assistance

We use AI writing tools to help with research organization, first drafts, translations and summaries. AI tools can make mistakes, including confident-sounding errors, so we do not publish AI output as-is. Our editors check facts against the official sources cited on the page and edit for accuracy and clarity before publishing.

We are open about the limits of this process. Editors catch most problems, but no process is perfect. That is why we cite sources, show dates and run a public corrections policy. AI tools do not make editorial decisions and are not used to decide anyone's eligibility. Our tools run fixed rules and calculations that we write and test.

Translations

Our Spanish pages are translated from the English versions, sometimes with machine or AI assistance, and then reviewed. Official form names, program names and quoted legal terms are kept in English where that helps readers match them to government documents.

Conflicts of interest

Close-up of a hand writing on paper documents with a pen at a desk

USVISA.com earns revenue from immigration attorneys who advertise on the site. We manage that conflict openly:

  • We tell readers how we make money on our About page and in our advertising disclosure.
  • Our guides describe free and low-cost options, including nonprofit legal services and DOJ-accredited representatives, even though those options do not earn us money. See free and low-cost legal help.
  • We tell readers when a task can reasonably be done without a lawyer.
  • Anyone who writes, edits or reviews a guide must tell us about personal or financial ties to the topic, and we will disclose relevant ties on the page.
  • Attorney reviewers review for legal accuracy. Reviewing a guide does not make them a recommended attorney, and reviewers do not receive placement in exchange for review.

Separation of advertising and editorial

  • Advertisers do not see, review, approve or edit our guides before publication.
  • Advertisers cannot pay for coverage, links within guides, favorable descriptions or removal of information.
  • Paid attorney placements are labeled "ADVERTISING" and are visually separate from our guides.
  • Our guides do not recommend or rank individual attorneys.

Feedback

If you think a page is wrong, outdated or unclear, please tell us at info@usvisa.com or through our corrections page.

Frequently asked questions

Are USVISA.com guides written by lawyers?

Not necessarily. Our guides are written and fact-checked by our editorial team against official sources. We are adding immigration attorneys as reviewers for legal guides. When a guide has been reviewed by an attorney, the reviewer's name appears on the page. If no reviewer is shown, it has not had attorney review yet.

Does USVISA.com use AI to write content?

Yes, as an assistant. We use AI tools to help organize research, prepare drafts and translate. Editors then check the facts against the official sources cited on the page and edit before publishing. AI does not make editorial decisions, and we correct errors publicly when we find them.

Can attorneys pay to change what a guide says?

No. Advertisers cannot review, approve or edit our guides, and they cannot pay for coverage, rankings or favorable mentions. Paid placements are labeled ADVERTISING and kept separate from editorial content. If you think a guide reads like an advertisement, tell us through our contact form and we will review it.

How do I know if a guide is current?

Each guide shows the date it was last updated, and figures that change, such as fees and Visa Bulletin dates, are marked "as of" a specific date. We review guides when rules change. Always confirm fees, forms and deadlines on the official government page linked in the guide before you act.

General information, not legal advice. Immigration rules change and every case is different; talk to a qualified immigration attorney about your situation. USVisa.com is not a government website. Spot an error? Tell us.